LIVERPOOL’S Luis Suarez recently issued a general apology to anyone who was offended by his use of the world ‘negro’ during his confrontation with Manchester United’s Patrice Evra.
Suspended for a total of 8 matches for his comment, Suarez insisted that he meant no offence when he used that word.
However, a noticeable aspect of his public apology was the lack of a mention of Patrice Evra, who had accused him of racism as a result of their clash during their 1-1 draw a few months ago. Evra insisted that Suarez insulted him 10 times.
‘I admitted to the commission that I said a word in Spanish once, and only once, and I told the panel members that I will not use it again on a football pitch in England,’ said Suarez.
The 24-year old, along with a number of Uruguayan football players had insisted that their language has had a tendency of being misinterpreted and seen as offensive by those who do not speak it.
‘I never, ever used this word in a derogatory way and if it offends anyone then I want to apologise for that.’
The apology comes as an attempt by Suarez and Liverpool to somehow put an end to the entire issue, after withdrawing from their earlier plans of filing an appeal for the player’s suspension.
Despite the club’s acceptance of the sentence, and Suarez’s public apology, Liverpool maintain that the resulting verdict came from the Football Association’s flawed disciplinary system, and by the harsh, confrontational and accusatory comment that came from Liverpool about the issue.
Another speculated factor was the FA’s attempt to showcase their aggressiveness and ‘zero tolerance’ in the issue of racial abuse.
The final report on the issue however stated that Suarez uttered the word seven times, while United manager Alex Ferguson insisted it was used five times.
According to Anfield representatives, an inconsistency in the report was the lack of mention of the discrepancy in the number of times the word was actually used – something that they think should have been considered an inconsistency of evidence.
Furthermore, Liverpool pointed out that Evra’s first statement accused Suarez of using the world ‘nigger’, which carried a weightier racist undertone compared to ‘negro’.
Also, the squad remain discontent by the fact that Evra was not penalised after admitting that he also used verbally insulting language to Suarez.
Suarez’s suspension has already dealt major damage on the Reds, who fell to Manchester City 3-0 Tuesday night.
They will also be without the striker in a number of other EPL matches, plus the FA cup competition and the double-legged Carling Cup faceoff, also against City.
AUTHOR’S OPINION
However one may see Suarez in this particular issue, the fact that he stepped up to publicly apologise should ease the blows coming his way. Also, one could say that Liverpool’s complaints about the commission report are due to bias, but the fact is if what they’re saying is true, no matter how much everyone wants to put this issue to rest the discrepancies will call for re-examination.
Chelsea have no immediate plans of appointing a permanent club manager, despite the increasing pressure to hand the position to caretaker Roberto Di Matteo.
Upon the departure of Andre Villas-Boas, the Italian took…
Juan Mata feels that Spanish striker David Villa should be given every chance to prove his fitness to Vicente del Bosque for his inclusion to the Euro 2012 squad.
The Barcelona striker has…
DECISION time is descending on Chelsea after their dramatic Champions League triumph over Bayern Munich on Saturday.
Owner Roman Abramovich and his advisers are set to hold talks concerning the team’s future focusing…
Manuel Neuer felt that the better team lost in the Champions League final after Bayern Munich were defeated by Chelsea in the Champions League on Saturday.
The two teams settled 1-1 at the…
Leave a Reply